|
| |
| |
|
Sea Turtle Monitoring - St. Croix
East End Beaches |
|
|
|
Survey work in the early 1990's
established that many beaches on St. Croix support marine turtle nesting,
but nesting was concentrated on Sandy Point NWR and the East End Beaches
known as East End Bay, Isaac's Bay, and Jack's Bay. Sandy Point had
(and continues to have) a comprehensive research
and monitoring program for the leatherback population. However,
significant Hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and Green (Chelonia
mydas) nesting activities were being identified during daytime surveys.
Lack of funding and resources prevented nighttime monitoring.
During
the 1994 nesting season, additional support was made possible under the U.S,
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Park Service (NPS)
Interagency Agreement, which allowed for the initiation of night monitoring
on both Sandy Point NWR and the East End Beaches. Nesting at Sandy Point
NWR proved to be much too diffuse within the refuge for effective coverage
without a large number of research personnel. As a result, daytime surveys
were carried out at Sandy Point NWR and night monitoring efforts were
concentrated on the East End Beaches. Night monitoring also revealed
how limiting daytime surveys can be (Amy Mackay, 2004). Night
monitoring with
saturation tagging allows researchers to better understand
the population as you can track individual turtles, their nesting habits,
and their fecundity (i.e. hatchling production).
These preliminary data elicited an
even larger commitment from USFWS during the 1995, 1996 and 1997 nesting
seasons. However, once baseline monitoring was completed only partial
funding was available for the 1998-2000 seasons. In 1999, The Nature
Conservancy (TNC) purchased the 300 acres that make up Jack’s and Isaac’s
Bay. This area adjoins another 300 acres owned by the territorial
government and creates a 600-acre protected area including the East End
Beaches. Beginning in 2001, TNC began funding sea turtle monitoring on the
East End Beaches and nighttime monitoring was resumed. (Amy Mackay, 2004).
In 2005, TNC enlisted the
assistance of WIMARCS to manage and operate this valuable sea turtle
monitoring project. Through TNC funding, WIMARCS continues to expand
and meet its goals of protecting and conserving local marine resources on
St. Croix. |
| |
|
Study Area |
|
The study area consists of three beaches located along
the south coast of St. Croix at the eastern end of the island. This area of
the island is characterized by hills having a maximum elevation of 672 feet
and steep slopes, some of which are near vertical. Vegetation on these
hillsides has been shaped by historical disturbances such as fire, clearing,
and grazing. Exotic species such as tan-tan (Leucaena leucocephala)
and guinea grass (Panicum maximum) dominate native, dry-forest
species such as cactus, Acacia, and ginger thomas (Tecoma stans).
Each of the three sites is described as a pocket beach, located at the base
of the surrounding hills. Although the beaches are separated from each
other by rocky headlands, they form a continuous beach complex.
|
|
|
|
Jack's Bay Beach |
|
This relatively narrow beach is
approximately 1.0 km in length and ranges in width from approximately 3m to
15m. This beach lacks any wave formed berm or other features associated
with wave action. Surface water runoff from the surrounding hills creates
temporary gullies that cut across the beach and into the sea. Vegetation
adjacent to the beach is composed of dense stands of sea grape (Cocoloba
uvifiera) mixed with thorny scrub.
The sand on this beach is typically fine-grained and compact,
partially mixed with marine debris and vegetation and covered with dense
mats of sandbur grass (Cenchrus incertus) and sea purslane (Sesuvium
portulacastrum). |
|
|
|
Isaac’s Bay Beach |
|
This beach is approximately 800m in length and ranges
in width from 5m to more than 60m. The central portion of the beach
contains wind and wave-deposited sand dunes that extend up the slope of the
hills behind the beach at an elevation of more than 6m above sea level.
Surface water runoff from the surrounding hills has been observed cutting
gullies into the beach area. During storms, the low lying area near the
east access trail fills with sea water and forms a temporary back swale.
Sea grape (Cocoloba uvifiera), buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus),
Acacia, ginger thomas (Tecoma stans) and guinea grass (Panicum
maximum) dominate the vegetation adjacent to this beach. This beach is
the only one of the three, which is not affected by artificial light. |
|
|
|
East End Bay Beach |
|
This beach is approximately 280m in length and ranges
in width from 5m to approximately 30m. This beach receives constant, strong
easterly winds creating waves and salt spray. This beach typically receives
large amounts of marine debris including wood, other floating materials, and
plastics due to the wind and wave action. Vegetation adjacent to this beach
consists of sea grape (Cocoloba uvifiera),
beach vines, and sea purslane (Sesuvium
portulacastrum) with guinea grass
(Panicum maximum), cactus, and Acacia covering the surrounding
hillsides and ridges. Surface water run-off from the surrounding hillsides
floods the area at all three access points to the beach |
|
|
|
Methods |
Study Area Coverage
The East End Beaches are
periodically patrolled during the day throughout the year with nighttime
monitoring being carried out from August 1st through November 15th.
Daytime patrols will continue through December 15th.
Hourly patrols are conducted from
2000 hours to 0400 hours. These patrols are conducted by a team
consisting of a principal investigator and three field leaders.
Data Collection
Basic data collection procedures are similar to
previous years, and follow the techniques described in the Manual of Sea
Turtle Research and Conservation Techniques (Pritchard et al., 1983).
Each time a turtle is encountered a data sheet is
completed. Morphological, nesting, behavioral data, and nest
parameters are recorded along with time and date of encounter. Nests
will be excavated after hatchlings emerge, and the contents categorized to
determine hatching success.
Unobserved activities are also
recorded. In these instances, an attempt is made to determine if the
activity had resulted in egg deposition and the species and location are
recorded.
When a turtle is observed, data is
collected using the following methods:
Nesting
|
|
When a turtle is encountered, the
date and time as well as the behavior at the time of sighting are recorded.
In order to minimize the potential impact on the turtle, no further
information is collected until egg deposition begns.
If a turtle leaves the beach
before successful egg deposition (dry run), at least one of her tags is read
before she enters the water. If the turtle has no inconel flipper tags and
no PIT tag she is considered “untagged” and at least one inconel flipper tag
is applied as the turtle is leaving the beach. |
|
|
|
Nest Location |
|
Beach marker stakes are placed
every 20 meters along the vegetation of each of the three beaches. These
stakes are made from 2”x 2”x 4’ lumber and provided by The Nature
Conservancy. All of the stakes are numbered and each beach is numbered
independently of the other beaches.
Nest locations are recorded by
measuring the distances from the two nearest stakes. In the event that a
nest is laid behind the stake line, negative measurements are recorded.
This system has proven very useful for locating nests after emergence,
without leaving any markers indicating the presence of individual nests,
except when stakes are lost or removed, as is the case each season. Because
this is not a new problem, additionally, a wooden popsicle stick is labeled
with the date and the turtle’s id number (one of her tag numbers) and placed
in the nest to assist with nest confirmation upon excavation. |
|
|
|
Tagging |
|
When a previously untagged turtle
or one that has lost one of its tags is encountered, tags are applied.
Ideally, each turtle leaves the beach after nesting with two external tags
and one internal PIT tag.
An inconel tag (PPQ, NNV, XXX, XXZ,
or RRN prefix) is applied to the posterior edge of one of the two front
flippers in the most suitable scale closest to the body (usually the first
or the second). Another inconel tag is placed along the interior edge of
one of the rear flippers proximal and adjacent to the first large scale.
The tags are applied so there is less than 1cm of tag extending beyond the
edge of the flipper. Tags are oriented so the tag number is on the dorsal
side of the flipper. Whenever possible, each turtle is tagged on the right
front flipper and the left rear flipper.
Turtles are also tagged with a
Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tag (Avid, 12mm). This tag is a small,
glass-encased microchip that is injected into the muscle of the front
shoulder. It is detected with a portable scanner and a tag-specific
nine-digit number is read. The tagging site is treated with Betadine before
and after the injection of the PIT tag. Tagging sites are closely examined
for signs of infection during subsequent nesting activities.
During prior seasons, PIT tag
application and retention are investigated by comparing two tagging sites.
As a result, some nesting females have a PIT tag in one of the front
flippers, between the scales closest to the body. However, retention in the
shoulder muscle is shown to be comparable and stranded animals are often
missing flippers but shoulder muscle is much more likely to be intact and
available for scanning. |
|
|
|
Sampling |
|
A blood sample is taken from each
female for ongoing genetic analysis. Blood is obtained from the dorsal
cervical sinus using a sterile syringe (3cc) with a 21g x 1.5” needle. A
small amount of heparin is used to prevent clotting. Blood samples are
prepared in lysis buffer shortly after collection. A back-up sample is also
prepared and frozen.
As with PIT tagging, the sampling
area is treated with Betadine before and after blood sampling. Sampling
areas are closely examined for signs of infection during subsequent nesting
activities.
Sampling only takes place during
egg deposition, and samples are only collected in accordance with issued
endangered species permits. |
|
|
|
Morphology |
|
Each turtle is closely examined,
usually during tamping or disguising, and all identifying characteristics
such as scars from old injuries, barnacles and other ectobiota, tag scars,
and other diagnostic markings are recorded on the data sheet.
Standard measurements are taken
including the curved carapace length and width. Curved carapace length (CCL)
is measured from the nuchal notch to the posterior tip of the carapace along
the medial line. Length is recorded to the longest side, if one posterior
marginal is longer, and this information is noted on the data sheet as
either right or left. An additional carapace length is measured for
hawksbills: from the nuchal notch to the notch between the pair of posterior
marginal scutes (supracaudals). (Green turtles lack a significant notch and
are measured only once.) Curved carapace (CCW) width is measured at the
widest point posterior to the front flippers and perpendicular to the medial
line.
All measurements for each female
are averaged for the season. |
|
|
|
Nest Excavation |
|
Nests are excavated after hatchling emergence is
confirmed by the presence of tracks or after nests are expected to hatch
according to the determined incubation period. Nest contents are examined
and results are recorded on a hatchling data sheet. All live hatchlings are
released and possible causes for poor hatch success are noted. Nest
contents are recorded including total numbers of hatched shells, dead
hatchlings, pipped and unpipped eggs, embryos, and undeveloped eggs.
|
|
|
|
|
|